Unit Outline

---

statement of inquiry

Military confrontations encourage scientific and technical innovation, which can have unintended consequences on states

global context

Scientific and Technical Innovation (Opportunity, risk, consequences and responsibility) - Students will explore the natural world and its laws; the interaction between people and the natural world; how humans use their understanding of scientific principles; the impact of scientific and technological advances on communities and environments; the impact of environments on human activity; how humans adapt environments to their needs.

key history concept

Consequence - History is the understanding of how forces in the past have shaped future people and societies. Students demonstrate competency as historical thinkers where they understand and can explain how significant events and people have had both short-term and long-lasting effects. Students use evidence and interpretations of those people and events to make comparisons between different points in time, and to make judgments about the extent to which those forces produced long-lasting and important consequences.

related history concept(s)

Causality - is the relationship between cause and effect and the internal and external factors that influence this relationship. In history, a cause is something that gives rise to an action, event, phenomenon, or condition. A consequence is a result or an effect of an action, phenomenon or condition. Causes and consequences are often examined together in relation to a specific event, phenomenon or time period, particularly over the “short term” and “long term”. The problem of “multiple causality” has also been central to historiography.

1. Did the USSR decay from within?

The USSR's command economy was amazingly productive in certain industries, but lagged far behind capitalist economies in important areas like consumer goods and modern tech. So to what extent was the collapse of the USSR the result of economic & ideological decay?

2. Did Ronald Reagan win the Cold War?

Many historians of the so called 'Reagan Victory School' credit Reagan with winning the Cold War. They argue that his pursuit of aggressive competition with the USSR pushed their system to the edge. But to what extent is this true? Does this over inflate Reagan's role as leader?

3. Was Mikhail Gorbachev to blame?

Mikhail Gorbachev came to power in 1985. Representing a new generation of Soviet leaders, Gorbachev hoped to reform the ailing Soviet system with more transparency and restructuring. Yet instead of mending the system, some argue his reforms broke it.

4. What role did people power play?

Whilst the Soviet system was clearly tottering long before 1989, it was clear to many that the nationalist uprisings in Eastern Europe that year were the point of no return. The USSR could have used force to maintain power but chose not to. So what happened?

5. Why did the USSR finally collapse?

It was clear by the end of 1989 that the Cold War had come to an end. But what wasn't clear was to what extent the USSR would continue to exist into the future. These questions came to a head in 1991 as communist hardliners sought to wrestle back control of the situation.

6. Assessment: Who, or what, ended the Cold War?

The end of the Cold War was both unexpected and sudden, leaving historians and political scientists struggling to explain it. This makes it a perfect topic for practicing our causal reasoning as historians. So who, or what, ended the Cold War? Or did it not even end?